Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Cotner v. State of Oklahoma
as 1:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Robert Cotner
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 15-2449
Plaintiff:
State of New York, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, State of Delaware, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, District of Columbia, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Bishop, Robert Krauss and United States of America, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss
Defendant - Appellee:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and The Clearing House Association, L.L.C.
Movant:
Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00665
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00457
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Rasvinder Dhaliwal v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
as 1:2015cv00706
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
The United States of America v. Walgreen Company
as 14-3392
Plaintiff:
ABC, The State of Maryland, The State of Minnesota and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fox Rx, Inc., ex rel.
Defendant:
DEF
Defendant - Appellee:
Walgreen Company
Fox Rx, Inc. v. Pharmerica Corp.
as 14-3501
Plaintiff:
ABC, State of North Carolina, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fox Rx, Inc., ex rel United States of America
Defendant:
DEF and MHA Long Term Care Network
Defendant - Appellee:
Pharmerica Corp., Neighborcare, Inc., Omnicare, Incorporated and others
Shew v. Malloy
as 14-319
Amicus Curiae:
Douglas Hall, Law Enforcement Action Network, State of Maryland and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Reuben F. Bradford, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Dannel P. Malloy, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Connecticut, Maureen Platt, in her official capacity as State's Attorney for the Waterbury Judicial District, Geographical Area No. 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephanie Cypher, Rabbi Mitchell Rocklin, June Shew and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Holly
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Defendant:
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Amicus Curiae:
State of Kentucky, Law Enforcement Action Network, Empire State Arms Collectors Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
William Nojay, Blueline Tactical & Police Supply, LLC, Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., John Amidon, Reuel A. Todd, Oswego County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-36
Amicus Curiae:
John Amidon, State of Delaware, State of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County
Defendant / Appellee:
Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York, Lawrence Friedman, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc., Batavia Marine & Sporting Supply, Thomas Galvin and others
Petitioner:
Donald B. Smith, Putnam County Sheriff, Timothy B. Howard, Erie County Sheriff, Barry C. Virts, Wayne County Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
