Cases 21 - 30 of 529
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blanchard v State of Oklahoma, et al.
as 5:2022cv00858
Petitioner:
James Robert Blanchard
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Enid Court House, Enid Lawyer Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00800
Petitioner:
Malik Mason
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swan v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
John Miguel Swan
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
Steve O'Neal Green
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. Governor of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Scott Nero
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAfee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tyree Lashawn McAfee
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, Jessica Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. State of Oklahoma Attorney General et al
as 5:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
James Henry Maxwell, Jr and S Claus
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma Attorney General and Wagoner County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nero v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Scott Nero
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Harcourt v. Dennis et al
as 5:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
William David Harcourt
Respondent:
Chad Dennis and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
