Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 117
CITY OF CHICAGO v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv01566
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF CHICAGO
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7062
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party: State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Elizabeth W. Kennedy
DC, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 20-5136
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Colorado, Bread for the City, 20cv127, State of Illinois and others
Defendant / Appellant: George E. Perdue, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and United States of America
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. James Owens, et al
as 20-1169
Petitioner: Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Public Citizen, Inc. and others
Intervenor: State of Minnesota, City and County of Denver, State of Vermont and others
Respondent: James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1167
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00119
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant: GEORGE E. PERDUE, III, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
U.T. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Plaintiff: M.H., LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER, H.D. and others
Defendant: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, CHAD F. WOLF and others
Petitioner: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Amicus Curiae: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Coalition for Responsible Reg v. EPA
as 09-1322
Intervenor: Michigan Manufacturers Association, Glass Packaging Institute, State of Utah and others
Petitioner: Great Northern Project Development, L.P., Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Rosebud Mining Company and others
Amicus Curiae: Nicola Scafetta, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, James P. Wallace, III and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
State of New York, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1022
Petitioner: State of Maine, People of the State of Michigan, State of Rhode Island and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-1239
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?