Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012mc00065
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
SINGLETON v. EAGLETON et al
as 2:2011cv06711
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. SINGLETON
Respondent:
WILLIE EAGLETON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINGLETON v. THE FEDERAL DISTRICT OF N.J. et al
as 2:2011cv04000
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. SINGLETON
Defendant:
THE FEDERAL DISTRICT OF N.J., VARIOUS U.S. MARSHALS, THE HACKENSACK BERGEN COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence L. Crawford v. New Jersey, et al
as 09-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD
Defendant - Non-Participating:
GEORGIA, STATE OF NJ, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA
Hartford Accident & Indemnity v. Lawrence Fitzpatrick
as 08-3650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO, Pittsburgh PA, INSURANCE CO OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CENTURY INDEMNITY CO, as successor to CIGNA Specialty Company, formerly known as California Union Insurance Company and others
Not Yet Classified:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS CREDITORS, LAWRENCE FITZPATRICK, Legal Representative to the Future Claimants, PHILIP A. PAHIGIAN, Legal Representative to the Future Silica Personal Injury Claimants and others
CRAWFORD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2008cv04187
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF N. CAROLINA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
State of Florida et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
State of Florida, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Fournier Industrie et Sante' and Laboratoires Fournier SA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
