Cases 31 - 40 of 1,107
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01231
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv01231
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, County of Davidson, Eric Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Cruter et al
as 3:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
Adam D. Cruter, Eric Jackson, Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01061
Petitioner:
Ronnie Tosh McCoy
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01206
Petitioner:
Lance White
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02622
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sims, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Washington v. State of Tennessee, The et al
as 3:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Angelos Washington
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, The, Tennessee Department of Correction and Bledsoe County Correction Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
