Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bailey, Jr. v. Brooks
as 3:2020cv00651
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
Brodvs, Egan Walker, Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poochigian v. Steinheimer et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Defendant:
Jennifer Mayhew, Connie Steinheimer, Luke Prengamen and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Poochigian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John Arpino v. Michael Cherry, et al
as 18-16020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Arpino v. USDC-NVR
as 18-71228
:
In re: JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Petitioner:
JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, AKA Johnny Bullets
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Real Party In Interest:
MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Arpino v. Michael Cherry, et al
as 18-15616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
Gadsden v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2017cv00728
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Donnelly, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Chioke Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOT USED
as 2:2017cv03091
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Donnelly, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Chioke Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Margaret-Ilene Pullen v. Chuck Allen, et al
as 17-17475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET-ILENE PULLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK ALLEN, BIGGAR, BOB BRADUS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
