Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hussey v. US, et al
as 11-2254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
McIntyre, et al v. US, et al
as 11-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMILY MCINTYRE, as Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre and CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, in his capacity as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
KAREN FLEMMI SNOW, JEANETTE FLEMMI BENEDETTI, JAMES FLYNN and others
Trustee:
FLEET NATIONAL BANK and DEDHAM INSTITUTIION FOR SAVINGS
McIntyre, et al v. US, et al
as 11-1018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EMILY MCINTYRE, as Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre and CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, in his capacity as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
ELAINE BARRETT, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur M. Barrett, KAREN FLEMMI SNOW, JEANETTE FLEMMI BENEDETTI and others
Trustee:
DEDHAM INSTITUTIION FOR SAVINGS and FLEET NATIONAL BANK
Hussey v. US, et al
as 10-2368
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
Hussey v. US, et al
as 10-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
Hussey v. US
as 10-1418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
Castucci, et al v. US
as 09-2183
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
BRIAN CASTUCCI, DENISE CASTUCCI, RICHARD J. CASTUCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS, JAMES J. BULGER and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
US DISTRICT ATTORNEY, District Attorneys for the Suffolk, Norfolk, and Middlesex Districts of Massachusetts and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castucci, et al v. US
as 09-2182
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
BRIAN CASTUCCI, DENISE CASTUCCI, RICHARD J. CASTUCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS, JAMES J. BULGER and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
US DISTRICT ATTORNEY, District Attorneys for the Suffolk, Norfolk, and Middlesex Districts of Massachusetts and ATTORNEY GENERAL
The Estate of Edward Brian Hal v. US, et al
as 09-1951
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD BRIAN HALLORAN, by Patricia Marie Maccarelli, in her capacity as Administratrix of The Estate of Edward Brian Halloran
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, acting through the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
The Estate of Edward Brian Hal v. US, et al
as 09-1952
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD BRIAN HALLORAN, by Patricia Marie Maccarelli, in her capacity as Administratrix of The Estate of Edward Brian Halloran
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, acting through the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN J. CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
