Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01015
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 2:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2022cv00505
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin and Warden Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2021cv00853
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Juanita V. Gardner, Javier Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 21-50147
Respondent / Appellee:
Corey Furr, Warden, Susan D. Reed, District Attorney, Juanita V. Gardner, Trial Judge and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2021cv00001
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Richardson v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, et al
as 20-50927
Respondent / Appellee:
Corey Furr, Warden, Susan D. Reed, District Attorney, Juanita V. Gardner, Trial Judge and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Richardson v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00202
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00043
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
