Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bettencourt v. City of San Leandro et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Bettencourt
Defendant:
City of San Leandro, Abdul D. Pridgen, Matthew Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jose v. Matthews et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Bettencourt Antonio Jose
Defendant:
Brady Matthews, Stephen Young, Abdul D. Pridgen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph D'Angelo v. Bank of Dene et al
as 2:2021mc01052
Plaintiff:
Joseph D'Angelo
Defendant:
Bank of Dene and Michael Stephen Young
Jayaraman et al v. Oakland Unified School District et al
as 3:2020cv00685
Plaintiff:
Saru~ Jayaraman, Deirdre Snyder, Zach Norris and others
Defendant:
Oakland Unified School District, Jeff Godown, Sergeant Donald Perrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humberd v. Bank of Dene et al
as 2:2019cv01419
Defendant:
Prime Business Services INC, Bank of Dene and Michael Stephen Young
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ann Humberd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Angelo v. Bank of Dene et al
as 2:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Bank of Dene, Prime Business Services, Inc. and Michael Stephen Young
Plaintiff:
Joseph D'Angelo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fasthorse et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02277
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Fasthorse
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse, Oglala Sioux Lakota Nation, Michael Stephen Young and others
Respondent:
Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and Clark County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Rick Stephen Young v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2008cv06665
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rick Stephen Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stephen Young v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 5:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Stephen Young
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
