Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gray v. Miles et al
as 5:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Glenwood Gray
Defendant:
Sergeant Robbie Miles, Wes Harris, City of Mt. Sterling, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. Gunkel et al
as 2:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Deputy Tabatha Sterling, Deputy Grant Morton, Sergeant Christopher Gunkel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles George Stein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Paul Mays
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Paul Mays
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benningfield v. Attorney General of the United States of America et al
as 0:2015cv00115
Petitioner:
Sterling R. Benningfield
Respondent:
Attorney General for the United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benningfield v. Snyder-Norris
as 0:2015cv00063
Petitioner:
Sterling R. Benningfield
Defendant:
Jodie L. Snyder-Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edwards v. Quintana
as 5:2015cv00214
Petitioner:
Elmer Sterling Edwards
Respondent:
Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hakin v. Montgomery County Regional Jail et al
as 5:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Abd'al-Azeez Jalal Hakim
Defendant:
Montgomery County Regional Jail , County of Montgomery , Mount Sterling, KY City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. Dennison et al
as 4:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Sterling Reneva Rivers
Defendant:
Darwin Dennison, Jason Woosley, Gail Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Woosley
as 4:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sterling Reneva Rivers
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Darwin Dennison, Gail Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
