Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Tony Jackson v. Tim Walz, et al
as 20-1805
Defendant / Appellee:
Cari Gerlicher, former Office of Special Investigations Director of the MNDOC, in her individual & official capacity, Sheila Packwood, Corrections Program Director, R.D.N.L.D, Food & Nutrition Services, in her Official capacity, Union Local 600 AFSCME, Individually & Official Capacity as Corrections Guard Unit, Representatives Stillwater Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson, Jail House Lawyer, Other Similarly Situated Prisoners At Stillwater Correctional Facility & Other Similarly Situated Prisoners At Rush City Correctional Facility & All Other Minnesota Correctional Facilities & Contracted Half Way Hou
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Prow v. Tom Roy, et al
as 17-2883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew Prow
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Roy, John King, Sandra O'Hara and others
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Deon Nunn v. Steve Hammer
as 16-4452
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jerome Deon Nunn
Respondent - Appellee:
Steve Hammer
Danny Ortega, Jr. v. Steve Hammer
as 16-4257
Petitioner - Appellant:
Danny Ortega, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Steve Hammer, Warden, MCF-STW
Jefferson v. Roy et al
as 0:2016cv03137
Plaintiff:
Bobby Earl Jefferson, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Roy , Minnesota Dept. of Corrections , Chris Pawelk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Hammer
as 0:2016cv03017
Petitioner:
Wilfred Carl Hudson
Defendant:
Steve Hammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
