Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Grenier v. Hartley, et al
as 10-1093
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT PETER GRENIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HARTLEY, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the Stae of Colorado
Butt v. Hartley, et al
as 10-1062
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID BUTT
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HARTLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Jones v. Hartley, et al
as 09-1530
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDRICK L. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HARTLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Grenier v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02553
Petitioner:
Albert Peter Grenier
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02560
Petitioner:
Ta'Rell Lavar Burton
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ries v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02522
Petitioner:
Jack Raymond Ries
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Compton v. Hartley, et al
as 09-1444
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER COMPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HARTLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Allsup v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02362
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Claude Allsup
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waddles v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02225
Petitioner:
Billy Ray Waddles
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ankeney v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02085
Plaintiff:
Randal Ankeney
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Steve Hartley, Tim Creany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
