Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham v. Whidden
as 2:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Harrison Bradley Cunningham
Defendant:
Steve Whidden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Whidden et al
as 2:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ransom Louis Collins
Defendant:
Steve Whidden, Reyes, Lieutenant Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Whidden et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Harrison Bradley Cunningham
Defendant:
Steve Whidden, Nestor Echevarria and Michael Afonso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Christine Scott
Defendant:
State of Florida, Sheriff Steve Whidden, Cheif Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Whidden, in his Individual Capacity, et al
as 2:2021cv00620
Plaintiff:
La'Travis Williams
Defendant:
Steve Whidden, in his Individual Capacity,, Nestor Echevarria, Michael Alfonso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Elver v. Steve Whidden
as 19-10385
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE WHIDDEN, in his official and individual capacity as Sheriff of Hendry County, Florida
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE ELVER
Speak v. Whidden et al
as 2:2018cv00826
Plaintiff:
Vernon Speak
Defendant:
Steve Whidden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Hendry County et al
as 2:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Peter Thornton
Defendant:
Hendry County, Steve Whidden, Robert Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
