Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Washington v. Aramark
as 3:2026cv50315
Plaintiff:
Eugene Steven Washington
Defendant:
Aramark
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Appellant Defenders
as 3:2026cv03237
Plaintiff:
Steven James
Defendant:
Appellant Defenders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2026cv08666
Plaintiff:
Steven Boyd
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Donnell Owens, Mamadou Diarra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mills v. Stevens Transport Inc et al
as 2:2026cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
Stevens Transport Inc and Ayed Kamil Abu-Ajameh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Jenkins v. Chadderton et al
as 3:2026cv00968
Plaintiff:
Steven Jenkins
Defendant:
Tara Chadderton, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markos v. U.S. Heritage Group, Inc.
as 1:2026cv08334
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamont Markos
Defendant:
U.S. Heritage Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Stevens v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08327
Plaintiff:
Meah Stevens
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Namaste Laboratories, LLC., and Strength of Nature, LLC.
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Russell v. Amber et al
as 3:2026cv00952
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Russell
Defendant:
Nurse Amber, Nurse Practitioner Amanda and Kyle Thole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bankston v. Dunlap et al
as 3:2026cv00950
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Bankston
Defendant:
Nicole Dunlap, Lacee Olinger, Billy McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
