Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Mellema v. VanOort et al
as 1:2023cv05883
Plaintiff:
Richard Mellema
Defendant:
Douglas M. VanOort, Mark W. Mallon, Kathryn B. McKenzie and others
Nominal Defendant:
NeoGenomics, Inc.
Vasquez v. Ritz-Trans Corporation of Pennsylvania Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07939
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Mendez Vasquez
Defendant:
Ritz-Trans Corporation of Pennsylvania Inc., Steven C. Hagan, XYZ Corporation No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ritz-Trans Corporation of Pennsylvania Inc. et al v. Vasquez
as 1:2022cv07930
Petitioner:
Ritz-Trans Corporation of Pennsylvania Inc. and Steven C. Hagan
Respondent:
Marilyn Mendez Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Raucci v. MacIntosh
as 9:2022cv00830
Petitioner:
Steven C. Raucci
Respondent:
Donita MacIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaidez v. Communications Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07155
Plaintiff:
Allen Chaidez
Defendant:
Communications Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Steven C. Webster and others
Rivera v. Communication Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10637
Plaintiff:
Bashir Rivera
Defendant:
Communication Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Steven C. Webster and others
Forshey v. Guarino et al
as 6:2021cv06619
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Forshey
Defendant:
Michael A. Guarino and Jeffrey R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolan v. Medallia, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07995
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dolan
Defendant:
Medallia, Inc., Leslie J. Stretch, Borge Hald and others
Chaidez v. Communications Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03835
Plaintiff:
Allen Chaidez
Defendant:
Communications Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Anita Kumar and others
Rivera v. Communication Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05500
Defendant:
Richard A. Primuth, Michael Zapata, Steven C. Webster and others
Plaintiff:
Bashir Rivera
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
