Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Choiniere v. Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07869
Plaintiff:
Steven Daniel Choiniere
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
14248 Oxnard St., LLC v. Steven Daniel et al
as 2:2018cv05643
Defendant:
Alex Gonzalez, Steven Daniel and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
14248 Oxnard St., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN DANIEL ZAVODNICK - #135419
as 3:2015mc80161
Respondent:
STEVEN DANIEL ZAVODNICK
Gary Steven Daniel v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2015cv03397
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Daniel
DeJarlais v. King et al
as 3:2015cv01005
Petitioner:
Steven Daniel DeJarlais
Respondent:
Audrey King and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gary Steven Daniel v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 2:2013cv07701
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Daniel
O'Toole et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 4:2011cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sean O'Toole , Kelley O'Toole , Steven Daniel Lee and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch , Antioch Police Department , James Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Toole et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2011cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sean O'Toole , Kelley O'Toole , Steven Daniel Lee and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch , Antioch Police Department , James Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Robbins Productions, Inc. et al v. United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California et al
as 2:2011cv01417
Respondent:
Nancy Hoffmeier, Steven Daniel Reuther and United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California
Petitioner:
Anthony Robbins, SDRTR, LLC and Tony Robbins Productions, Inc.
Steven Daniel Force v. Stephen Mayberg
as 8:2010cv01316
Petitioner:
Steven Daniel Force
Respondent:
Stephen Mayberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
