Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Heninston Francis v. M. McBride, et al
as 23-14037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENINSTON STEVEN FRANCIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MCBRIDE and J. LANG
D'AMICO v. DESANTIS et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
STEVEN FRANCIS D'AMICO
Defendant:
RONALD DESANTIS and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Amico v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
United States of America and Marcia Morales Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Amico v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv24225
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert N. Scola, Federico A. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Amico v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv62089
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2022cv62032
Plaintiff:
Heninston Steven Francis
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff's Office, WellPath, Maggie Raspberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
D'AMICO v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00250
Petitioner:
STEVEN FRANCIS D'AMICO
Defendant:
Jennifer J Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D'Amico v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv61847
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Amico v. Johnson
as 5:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
Jennifer J Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D'Amico v. Quter et al
as 0:2022cv60378
Plaintiff:
Steven Francis D'Amico
Defendant:
Jack Quter and Unknown Judicial Agent(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
