Cases 31 - 34 of 34
Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP et al v. Dell Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00076
Plaintiff:
Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP and others
Defendant:
Dell Inc., Kevin B. Rollins, James M. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Delphi Corporation Securities, Derivative and "Erisa" Litigation
as 2:2005md01725
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hanners, Carolyn Hanners, Vanessa Jones and others
Defendant:
Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P., Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P., Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P. and others
Objector:
Pamela Geller
Special Master:
Lyan Phillips
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MERCK & CO., INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION
as 2:2005cv01151
In Re:
MERCK & CO., INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION
Petitioner:
SEB FONDER, CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and AMALGAMATED BANK
Not Classified By Court:
JEFF M. BROWN and MICHAEL J. RINIS
Special Master:
LAYN R. PHILLIPS
Lead Plaintiff:
ROBERT CIMATO, DORIS STAEHR, HALPERT ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY DOUGLAS HORNE, JR., DARRELL W. NELSON, ZEPH UGWUNERI and others
Not Yet Classified:
AEGON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT B.V. ACTING JOINTLY WITH AEGON CUSTODY B.V., KUWAIT INVESTMENT OFFICE, THE LONDON OFFICE OF KUWAIT INVESTMENT AUTHORITY, TRANSAMERICA FUNDS and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., RAYMOND V. GILMARTIN, MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
In Re: Nortel Networks Corp. Securities Litigation
as 1:2005md01659
Plaintiff:
Jose I. Galindez, Jose I. Galindez, Jose I. Galindez and others
Defendant:
Nortel Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Corporation, Frank A. Dunn and others
Movant:
Tom Cosgrove, Tom Cosgrove, Tom Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
