Cases 1 - 10 of 132
MCGM, GmbH v. OPTA Group LLC
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
MCGM, GMBH and MANAGEMENT CONSULTING GROUP, GMBH
Defendant:
OPTA GROUP LLC, JEFF STONE, OLIVER MAIER and others
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Randall v. Oneil
as 23-7616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARROD CARL RANDALL and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLEEN M. ONEIL, Former Sheriff, BRIAN R. MCDERMOTT, Former Under-Sheriff, PETER R. BARNETT, Sheriff and others
Peralta v. Salcedo
as 23-839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robinson Peralta
Defendant / Appellee:
Hansel Salcedo, Detective NYPD and Daniel Wynne, Detective Badge # 11292-NYPD
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, IAB, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Repicci v. Jarvis
as 22-3098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John A. Repicci, Lorraine Repicci and Julie Stone, as Trustee of the John A. Repicci Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Jarvis
Defendant:
OJM Group, LLC
Goney v. SuttonPark Capital LLC
as 22-1830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rodney Goney, Lori Goney and T.N., through his Power of Attorney
Defendant / Appellee:
SuttonPark Capital LLC, SuttonPark Structured Settlements LLC and Edward Stone
James v. Maraj
as 22-1781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Emanuel James, AKA Briss Stone
Defendant / Appellee:
Onicka Maraj, AKA Nicki Minaj
Demarest v. Underhill
as 22-956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David P. Demarest and David Parsons Demarest
Defendant / Appellee:
Town of Underhill, a municipality and charter town, Daniel Steinabauer, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, Bob Stone, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Defendant:
Front Porch Forum, as a Public Benefit 15 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 16 factual considerations while serving the traditional governmental role of providing 17 "Essential Civic Infrastructure" rangi and Jericho Underhill Land Trust, as NonProfit 21 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 22 factual considerations and a special relationship willfully participating in and 23 actively directing acquisition of mun
Saba Capital CEF Opportunities v. Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fu
as 22-407
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Saba Capital CEF Opportunities 1, Ltd. and Saba Capital Management, L.P.
Defendant / Appellant:
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund, Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund, Nuveen Short Duration Credit Opportunities Fund and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
