Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HARTSELLE MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
HARTSELLE MEDICAL CENTER, DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER, STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
MEDICAL CENTER OF MESQUITE et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01968
Plaintiff:
JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, EAST GEORGIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, JOHNSON CITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carilion Medical Center, 15cv192, Tarpon Springs Hospital Foundation, Inc., 15cv192, Southwest Volusia Healthcare Corporation, 15cv192 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Southlake Specialty Hospital, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Rockwall Regional Center, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Rockwall, Flower Mound Hospital Partners, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Wasson v. Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston, The
as 1:2019cv00431
Defendant:
Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston, The and Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston, The d/b/a RMC-Stringfellow Memorial Hospital
Plaintiff:
Steve Wasson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER et al v. THOMAS EDMUNDS PRICE
as 1:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER , SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER , SAINT JAMES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS EDMUNDS PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , HIGHLANDS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , BROOKSVILLE REGIONAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00811
Plaintiff:
HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, RIVERVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
