Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Couch v. Ahmed et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00751
Plaintiff: Harold Couch
Defendant: Faisal Ahmed, Rosie Clagg, Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabel v. Hudson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01057
Plaintiff: Kermit Gabel
Defendant: Stuart Hudson and Miles Finney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spar v. Mohr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00546
Plaintiff: Eric R. Spar
Defendant: Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, John DesMarias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Prather v. Stuart Hudson
as 14-3366
Petitioner - Appellant: LONNIE F. PRATHER
Respondent - Appellee: STUART HUDSON
Teagarden v. Coleman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff: Trevor Teagarden
Defendant: John Coleman, Kevin Jones, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Younker v. Mohr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01116
Plaintiff: Aaron D Younker
Defendant: Gary Mohr and Stuart Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brookes v. Shank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00516
Plaintiff: Mark C Brookes
Defendant: Myron Shank, John DesMarais, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chetankumar Patel v. Stuart Hudson
as 13-3310
Petitioner - Appellant: CHETANKUMAR PRAVIN PATEL
Respondent - Appellee: STUART HUDSON, Warden
Elliott Cherry v. Stuart Hudson
as 12-4421
Petitioner - Appellant: ELLIOTT CHERRY
Respondent - Appellee: STUART HUDSON
Wood v. Mohr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00978
Plaintiff: Tyran Wood
Defendant: Gary Mohr, Stuart Hudson, Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?