Cases 1 - 10 of 24
QUINTANA v. NJ STATE et al
as 2:2013cv04302
Petitioner:
JOSE QUINTANA
Respondent:
NJ STATE, STUART RABNER, MICHAEL J. NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KADONSKY v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 3:2011cv01250
Petitioner:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHESTER v. BARTOWSKI et al
as 2:2010cv04192
Petitioner:
WAYMON CHESTER
Respondent:
GREG BARTOWSKI and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Olowu v. Atty Gen NJ, et al
as 10-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID OLOWU
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNE MILGRAM, Attorney General of New Jersey, STUART RABNER, Chief Justice of New Jersey and LEEANN CUNNINGHAM, Assistant County Prosecutor, and as for, Essex County Prosecutor.
Lester Denmon v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 09-3823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER M. DENMON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and STUART RABNER, The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
Ronald Jones v. George Hayman, et al
as 09-3334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner N.J. Department of Corrections, LYDELL SHERRER, Warden Northern State Prison and STUART RABNER, Attorney General State of New Jersey
Roberto Rodriguez v. Grace Rogers, et al
as 08-3111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ, AKA Roger Alexis Manzanares
Defendant:
GRACE ROGERS and STUART RABNER
TIERNEY v. RICCI et al
as 2:2008cv01918
Petitioner:
MICHELLE TIERNEY
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. RABNER
as 1:2008cv00669
Petitioner:
KEVIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TIERNEY v. RICCI et al
as 2:2008cv00511
Petitioner:
MICHELLE TIERNEY
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
