Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Subway Franchise Systems of Canada, ULC v. Subway Developments 2000 Inc.
as 1:2024cv00593
Petitioner: Subway Franchise Systems of Canada, ULC
Respondent: Subway Developments 2000 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-22
Petitioner: Towaki Komatsu
Respondent: The City of New York, James O'Neill, sued in their individual and official capacities., Bill De Blasio, sued in their individual and official capacities. and others
Soliman v. Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, LTD.
as 22-1726
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marina Soliman, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, LTD.
Defendant: Does, 1 through 20, inclusive, and each of them
Subway Protein Litigation Corp. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff: Subway Protein Litigation Corp.
Defendant: Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party: Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court: Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff: Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant: Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader: MNZ Inc
Respondent: Visa Inc.
Intervenor: Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant: Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant: St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Subway International B.V. v. Subway Russia Franchising Company, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv07362
Petitioner: Subway International B.V.
Respondent: Subway Russia Franchising Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Subway Protein Litigation Corp. v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00869
Defendant: Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, Agri Stats, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Subway Protein Litigation Corp., as Litigation Trustee of Subway Protein Litigation Trust and Subway Protein Litigation Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Raymond A. Semente D.C., P.C. v. Empire Healthchoice Assurance
as 21-785
Defendant: Verizon Advanced Data Inc., Verizon Avenue Corp., Verizon New England Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Raymond A. Semente D.C., P.C.
Counter Claimant: The Employee Medical Health Plan of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Labor/Management Committee and County of Suffolk
Defendant / Appellee: Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc., DBA Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield
John v. Comptroller Office of the Stat
as 20-2542
Defendant / Appellee: John Doe, Badge #12394 TD Subway Cop NYPD, TD 30 NYPD Subway Cop 1, Office of the New York State Comptroller, 1 Centre Street New York NY 10007 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sheldon Dashawn John
Shinn v. Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, LTD.
as 3:2020cv01162
Defendant: Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, LTD.
Plaintiff: Christmene Shinn

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?