Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sullivan v. Darrin Adams Distribution Inc.
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Bryan W. Sullivan
Defendant:
Darrin Adams Distribution Inc. and Hearld, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jack et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2022cv02623
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jack, Vicky Rankins, Mary Garfield and others
Defendant:
Jasmine Richardson, Charrnese Clark, EAN Holdings, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen and Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Baize et al v. England et al
as 4:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Kelly Baize and Billy Baize
Defendant:
Transport Services of Sullivan and David D. England
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fuller et al v. Logeman et al
as 2:2018cv02286
Plaintiff:
Markita Fuller and Lena Sullivan
Defendant:
Jonathan Logeman and TanTara Transportation Corp.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Probus et al v. Saum et al
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Lynda Probus , M.P. , Melissa Craddock and others
Defendant:
Timothy P. Saum , Southwestern Illinois Bus Company, LLC II and Lakeland Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Staples v. Robertson
as 5:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
Courtney Sullivan Staples
Defendant:
Sandra R. Robertson and Sandra R. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Artrip v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Artrip
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sullivan et al v. Bergel et al
as 5:2007cv00254
Defendant:
Illinois National Insurance Company, American International Group, Inc. and AIG-Risk Management, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Kentucky Employers' Mutual Insurance
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
