Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NEYMAN et al v. SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
RANDALL NEYMAN and REBECCA HOCHSTETLER
Defendant:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
HISCOX INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. MRB LAWN SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02827
Defendant:
MRB LAWN SERVICES, LLC, MRB LAWN SERVICE and SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
HISCOX INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
SCHLACKS et al v. LOVE
as 2:2021mc00060
Plaintiff:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL LOVE
Petitioner:
DANIELLE SCHLACKS and JABBOK SCHLACKS
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. XENOS et al
as 5:2020cv03246
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MILLER, C&G HARKNIGHT HOMES, LLC, MODERN EDGE TRANSPORTATION GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. GARVEY
as 2:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL GARVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON et al v. SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and THE INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF HANNOVER
Defendant:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLENDENIN et al v. GETINGE HOLDINGS, USA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03933
Plaintiff:
DIANA CLENDENIN and ROY CLENDENIN
Defendant:
GETINGE HOLDINGS, USA, INC. , ATLANTIC BIOMEDICAL, INC., ABM ECURITY SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
GETINGE HOLDINGS, USA, INC.
Cross_defendant:
ABM ECURITY SERVICES, INC., ATLANTIC BIOMEDICAL, INC. and SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. COLONY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv02199
Plaintiff:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
COLONY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
