Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Carter v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Lori Carter
Defendant:
SunTrust Banks, Inc., SunTrust Banks, Inc. Short Term Disability Plan and Suntrust Banks, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 3:2009cv00706
Plaintiff:
Terrell Parker, Terrell Parker and Terrell Parker
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jordan v. Suntrust Bank, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02173
Plaintiff:
Rinata Jordan
Defendant:
Suntrust Bank, Inc. and Suntrust Bank, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SunTrust Banks, Inc. v. Garst et al
as 3:2007cv00398
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Banks, Inc. and SunTrust Banks, Inc.
Defendant:
Tom P Garst, Terri Carlin and Mountain Commerce Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beightler v. SunTrust Banks, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02532
Plaintiff:
Stephen Beightler
Defendant:
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Helton v. Suntrust Bank, Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00188
Plaintiff:
Hurdle Helton
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Inc, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
