Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kurtz v. Supercuts et al
as 1:2012cv01195
Plaintiff:
Allyn Kurtz
Defendant:
Supercuts and Regis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolin v. Chicago Supercuts Limited Partnership
as 1:2011cv01241
Defendant:
Chicago Supercuts Limited Partnership
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Dolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010at00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doris Miller v. The Regis Corporation, et al
as 08-56088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORIS MILLER, on behalf of herself, the general public and as an "aggrieved employees" under the California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE REGIS CORPORATION and SUPERCUTS CORPORATE STORES INC., Erroneously Sued as Supercuts Corporate Shops Inc.
Michele Kenny v. Regis Corporation, et al
as 08-80093
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MICHELE KENNY
Defendant - Respondent:
REGIS CORPORATION, SUPERCUTS, INC. and SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and CONSUMER ATTORNEYS OF CALIFORNIA
Riches v. Supercuts
as 3:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Supercuts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doris Miller v. The Regis Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv04587
Plaintiff:
Doris Miller and Doris Miller
Defendant:
The Regis Corporation, The Regis Corporation, Supercuts Corporate Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
