Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Alirez Morirahimi et al v. Regis Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv02279
Plaintiff:
Alireza Morirahimi and Parvin Mosvi
Defendant:
Does 1-50, inclusive, Regis Corporation and Supercuts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alirez Morirahimi et al v. Regis Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv10930
Plaintiff:
Alireza Morirahimi and Parvin Mosvi
Defendant:
Regis Corporation, Does 1-50, inclusive and Supercuts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
International Franchise Association et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2020cv02243
Plaintiff:
DD Independent Franchise Owners Association, International Franchise Association, Supercuts Franchisee Association and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Katie Hagen, Lilia Garcia-Brower and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martinez v. Supercuts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
Katherine Martinez
Defendant:
Does 1-20, Supercuts, Inc. and Supercuts, Inc. doing business as Encinitas Ranch Supercuts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
