Cases 11 - 20 of 4,013
Davis v. Royce
as 24-863
Petitioner:
LASHAWAN DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK ROYCE, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctinoal Facility
Tubbs v. Venettozzi
as 24-841
Plaintiff:
DARNELL TUBBS
Defendant:
DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security at Upstate Correctional Facility, WAYNE GARLAND, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Burgan v. Lilley
as 24-847
Petitioner:
BEVON BURGAN
Respondent:
LYNN LILLEY, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
Suarez v. Sullivan
as 24-872
Plaintiff:
ELVIN SUAREZ
Defendant:
ROBERT MORTON, Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, RYAN LAHEY, Office of Mental Health Unit Chief, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, ABADUL QAYYUM, Psychiatrist, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity and others
Tripathy v. Lockwood
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY, -
Defendant:
Captain LOCKWOOD, Reverand HARRIS, SORC R. HOFFMAN, IGRC Chairperson and others
Stines v. Superintendent
as 9:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Tyeree Stines
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Towaun Coleman
Defendant:
Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility and J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kroll et al v. The Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility
as 6:2024cv06193
Plaintiff:
Jason Kroll and Jason White
Defendant:
The Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
