Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Assaf v. New Albertson's Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
Mariana C. Assaf
Defendant:
New Albertson's Inc. and Supervalu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Waste Action Project v. Supervalu, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05118
Plaintiff:
Waste Action Project
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Andreasen v. SuperValu Inc., et al
as 3:2012cv05063
Plaintiff:
Tony C Andreasen
Defendant:
SuperValu Inc , Dave Weist, Jane Doe Wiest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv10175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Hirsch v. A H and S Construction Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv09007
Defendant:
A H and S Construction Corporation, AOL Time Warner Inc, Albertsons Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Hirsch
Nassif et al v. Supervalu, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01273
Defendant:
Albertson's LLC, New Albertson's Inc. and Supervalu, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janet Nassif and Thomas Nassif
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cynthia Flores v. SuperValu, Inc., et al
as 11-56075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA FLORES, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERVALU, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC., SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS and others
Cynthia Flores v. SuperValu, Inc., et al
as 10-56497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA FLORES, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERVALU, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC., SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
