Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robert Lindblad v. USDC-CASF
as 22-70089
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROBERT MICHAEL LINDBLAD, BRIAN HAYEK, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT MICHAEL LINDBLAD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Robert Lindblad v. Kandis Westmore, et al
as 21-16820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LINDBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, JON S. TIGAR, LAUREL D. BEELER and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-15001
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SEEBORG, KIMBERLY MCCRICKARD, WILLIAM H. ORRICK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG and KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Steven Bonilla v. Susan Soong, et al
as 20-15951
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCE CHHABRIA, US District Court Judge and SUSAN Y. SOONG, Clerk of Court, USDC Northern District of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 20-15691
Defendant / Appellee:
CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, JAMES WARE, former Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and as an Individual, KANDIS A. WESTMORE, former Magistrate District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and as an Individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Kuang Ou-Young v. John Roberts, Jr.
as 19-2216
Defendant / Appellee:
A. W. RUPSKA, DONALD M. O'KEEFE, JAMES MCNAIR THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG BAO OU-YOUNG
Bhambra v. Administrative Office of the Federal Courts of the United States et al
as 4:2018cv05681
Defendant:
Susan Y. Soong, Administrative Office of the Federal Courts of the United States and Clerk of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California
Plaintiff:
Harjit Bhambra
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
