Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Roper v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Bobby Roper
Defendant:
SUTHERLAND GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sutherland Global Services, Inc. v. Sengupta et al
as 1:2021cv00401
Plaintiff:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Sitel Operating Corporation and Ratul Sengupta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reinbolt v. Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02104
Plaintiff:
John S. Reinbolt
Defendant:
Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc. and Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jackson v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
as 4:2017cv03137
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Jackson
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sutherland Global Services, Inc. et al v. Olivedale, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00647
Defendant:
1 Mosaic Health Inc. and Olivedale, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc. and Sutherland Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Payne v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01817
Plaintiff:
Marlo Payne
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 2101
John Colin Suttles v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00752
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Sutherland Global Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Colin Suttles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Adam Technologies International S.A. de C.V. v. Sutherland Global Services Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01706
Plaintiff:
Adam Technologies International S.A. de C.V.
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services Inc. and Dan McCue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adam Technologies International S.A. de C.V. v. Sutherland Global Services Inc.
as 3:2010cv01172
Plaintiff:
Adam Technologies International S.A. de C.V.
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
