Cases 51 - 60 of 61
James G. Garcia v. Debra Dexter et al
as 5:2008cv00253
Respondent:
Debra Dexter and Suzan L Hubbard
Petitioner:
James G Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Roy Williamson v. Suzan L Hubbard
as 2:2007cv07456
Petitioner:
Stephen Roy Williamson
Respondent:
Suzan L Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. Hubbard
as 5:2007cv05624
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Hopkins
Defendant:
Suzan L. Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05457
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodgers v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv02269
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rodgers
Defendant:
James Tilton, Suzan L. Hubbard, Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Tilton, et al.,
as 2:2007cv01803
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
James Tilton, Suzan L. Hubbard, Teresa Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delander v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2007cv01693
Petitioner:
Steven William Delander
Respondent:
Suzan L Hubbard and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Hubbard et al
as 2:2007cv01558
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Suzan L. Hubbard, James Tilton, Sterling O'Ran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franck v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2007cv00846
Petitioner:
James H Franck
Respondent:
Suzan L Hubbard and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
Warren Romero
Defendant:
Suzan L. Hubbard, J. S. Woodford and Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
