Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Phillip Morris International Inc. et al
as 2:2024at00393
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Phillip Morris International Inc. and Swedish Match North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Doe v. Phillip Morris International Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tobin Bates-Ferreira
Defendant:
Phillip Morris International Inc. and Swedish Match North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wolters v. Swedish Match North America, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Bailey Wolters
Defendant:
Swedish Match North America, LLC and Philip Morris International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Dryft Sciences, LLC v. Swedish Match North America, LLC
as 2:2022cv05355
Plaintiff:
Dryft Sciences, LLC
Defendant:
Swedish Match North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Modoral Brands Inc. v. Swedish Match North America LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05013
Defendant:
Swedish Match North America LLC, NYZ AB and Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP
Plaintiff:
Modoral Brands Inc.
Counter Claimant:
wm17 Holding GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al v. Kretek International, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08729
Defendant:
Dryft Sciences, LLC and Kretek International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NYZ AB, Swedish Match North America, LLC and Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al v. The Art Factory AB et al
as 2:2020cv01322
Plaintiff:
NYZ AB, Swedish Match North America LLC, WM17 Holding GMBH and others
Defendant:
Kretek International, Inc., Dryft Sciences, LLC, Tillce AB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
