Cases 1 - 10 of 81
REHMAN v. CHADIVE et al
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
SYED REHMAN
Defendant:
Sridhar Chadive, Vasanthi Chadive, Srikanth Chadive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PETROLEUM MARKETING GROUP, INC. v. KAZMI et al
as 3:2023cv22418
Plaintiff:
PETROLEUM MARKETING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
Syed Kazmi, SHAMIKH KAZMI, UNIVERSAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KARUPAIYAN et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv20928
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, P. P. and R. P.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP OF NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
7-ELEVEN, INC., v. KRSM INC et al
as 3:2022cv07220
Counter Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.,
Defendant:
KRSM INC and SYED KAZMI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
COHEN v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE et al
as 2:2022cv04788
Plaintiff:
MINDY COHEN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, HINTZE, BENDUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NAQVI et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2021cv09411
Plaintiff:
AHMER SYED NAQVI and S.N.
Defendant:
SUSAN DIBBINS, TERRI J. ROBINSON, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
