Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2012cv02070
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Huff , Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Calhoun v. County, San Diego et al
as 3:2010cv02263
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
County, San Diego, William Q. Hayes , Irma E. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00522
Defendant:
San Diego County, William V. Gallo, Dana M. Sabraw and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PROFESSIONAL SALES, INC. et al v. CURTIS et al
as 2:2009cv04024
Plaintiff:
PROFESSIONAL SALES, INC. and LOUIS J. MASCARO
Defendant:
BRET CURTIS, BEVERLY HILLS CLASSIC CARS, SYMBOLIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2009cv01830
Defendant:
Remax, Del Mar Ractrack and Casino, Google and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dana Benjamin v. Shelby Supercars LLC et al
as 5:2009cv01553
Defendant:
Shelby Supercars LLC, Shelby Supercars Inc, Jerod Shelby and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Benjamin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Autosport Designs Inc. v. Arnott et al
as 2:2008cv01749
Plaintiff:
Autosport Designs Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Arnott, Premier Financial Services, Inc. and Symbolic Motor Car Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
