Cases 1 - 10 of 372
Schaefer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01752
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaefer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oliver v. AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Oliver
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Hasson et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hasson and Chad Graddy
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodge v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Hodge
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Unruh et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
Ryan Unruh and Christopher Isbell
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Panchal et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pina Panchal and South Tampa Cardiology, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schanz et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Ashley Schanz and Sebastian Schanz
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
