Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Villalobos v. T-Mobile
as 3:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Nicole Villalobos
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hernandez v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joahn Alexander Hernandez
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Kaythlen Doe, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Butts v. Breeland et al
as 1:2021cv00712
Defendant:
Alice Breeland, Virginia Police, Health America and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Butts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA/DEA v. Samsung T-Mobile Cellular Telephone utilized by Azim Showell
as 1:2014mc00288
Plaintiff:
USA/DEA
Defendant:
Samsung T-Mobile Cellular Telephone utilized by Azim Showell
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. State Street Building, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
State Street Building, Inc.
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
State Street Building, Inc.
Counterclaim_defendant:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Hamilton Township et al
as 3:2013cv01518
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
Hamilton Township and Zoning Hearing Board of Hamilton Township
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA/Postal Inspector v. Grey, Pantech AT&T Mobile Phone
as 1:2012mc00073
Plaintiff:
USA/Postal Inspector
Defendant:
Grey, Pantech AT&T Mobile Phone
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
