Cases 41 - 50 of 78
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00664
Plaintiff:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant:
MARSHA BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AQUA PENNSYLVANIA, INC. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2014cv04742
Plaintiff:
AQUA PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA/DEA v. Samsung T-Mobile Cellular Telephone utilized by Azim Showell
as 1:2014mc00288
Plaintiff:
USA/DEA
Defendant:
Samsung T-Mobile Cellular Telephone utilized by Azim Showell
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. State Street Building, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
State Street Building, Inc.
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
State Street Building, Inc.
Counterclaim_defendant:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER'S BAY CONDOMINIUM NUMBER II v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01841
Plaintiff:
BAKER'S BAY CONDOMINIUM NUMBER II
Defendant:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv03719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Hamilton Township et al
as 3:2013cv01518
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
Hamilton Township and Zoning Hearing Board of Hamilton Township
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
METROCOM CELLULAR INC. v. AT&T MOBILITY II, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02778
Plaintiff:
METROCOM CELLULAR INC.
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY II, LLC and AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
