Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Scosche Industries, Inc. v. S and T Montgomery Distributing, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv09030
Plaintiff:
Scosche Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
S & T Montgomery Distributing, Inc doing business as Montgomery Distributing Inc., Scott Montgomery, Patricia Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ronald Adams v. CDCR, et al
as 21-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Secretary, STEVEN C. SUZUKAWA, Superior Court Judge and others
Kachelmyer et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera, Mark Allyn Stack, Robert Joseph Stanley and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Adams v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Jose Gastelo, Steven Suzukawa, Kathleen Allison and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Sonds v. P. Griffiths, et al
as 13-56118
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD SONDS
Respondent - Appellee:
P. GRIFFITHS, JOHN YOST, R. WERLINGER and others
Reginald Sonds v. P. Griffiths, et al
as 13-55823
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD SONDS
Respondent - Appellee:
P. GRIFFITHS, JOHN YOST, R. WERLINGER and others
Eric Montgomery v. Michael Astrue
as 12-56762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC T. MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Reginald Sonds v. P Griffiths et al
as 2:2011cv06600
Respondent:
MIKE FOLINA, P GRIFFITHS, K. HITE and others
Petitioner:
REGINALD SONDS
Eric T. Montgomery v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2011cv01258
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eric T Montgomery
Tina R Haro, et al v. Los Angeles City of
as 2:2002cv09587
Plaintiff:
Tina R Haro, James A Pitillo, John R Boyd and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
