Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv02649
Plaintiff: HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC
Defendant: UNITED STATES, Aacting commissioner TROY A MILLER, PORT DIRECTOR TENEVAL T THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305 Custom Duties:0Forfeiture-Immoral Articles
WHITFIELD v. FERRO CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv13750
Plaintiff: MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant: FERRO CORPORATION, PETER T. THOMAS, DAVID A. LORBER and others
WHITFIELD v. FERRO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv13750
Plaintiff: MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant: FERRO CORPORATION, PETER T. THOMAS, DAVID A. LORBER and others
Stein v. CAPPELINE et al
as 2:2019cv20474
Defendant: ROBERT J. ZATTA, KIM ANN MINK, LINDA MYRICK and others
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
STEIN v. CAPPELINE et al
as 3:2019cv20474
Defendant: ROBERT J. ZATTA, KIM ANN MINK, LINDA MYRICK and others
Plaintiff: SHIVA STEIN
ELLIOTT v. THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv08504
Plaintiff: TARIQ ELLIOTT
Defendant: THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, ROBERT WALL, BASHITI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv06163
Plaintiff: BOOKER T. THOMAS
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. VAN DAM
as 8:2014mc00267
Respondent: T. THOMAS VAN DAM
KANE v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2010cv00970
Plaintiff: EDWARD M. KANE
Defendant: DEWEY T. THOMAS, RON CAMPBELL, CROMARTIE TRANSPORTATION LINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SIMMONS et al v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2009cv06484
Plaintiff: ALPHONZO SIMMONS, STEPHEN MAGEE and KENNETH BROWN
Defendant: DEWEY T. THOMAS, RON CAMPBELL, CROMARTIE TRANSPORATION LINES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?