Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Martinez v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01908
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Bickell et al
as 3:2014cv01792
Plaintiff:
Rodney Anderson
Defendant:
T. Bickell, J. Ditty, T. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bieros v. Bickell et al
as 1:2013cv02767
Petitioner:
Roger Edward Jerome Bieros
Respondent:
T. Bickell, J. Wetzel, SCIH Property Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BIEROS v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2013cv06418
Petitioner:
ROGER EDWARD JEROME BIEROS
Respondent:
T. BICKELL, PCRACT PHILA and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bieros v. Bickell et al
as 1:2013cv02659
Petitioner:
Roger Edward Jerome Bieros
Respondent:
T. Bickell, PCRACT Phila and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bieros v. Bickell et al
as 1:2013cv02567
Petitioner:
Roger Edward Jerome Bieros
Respondent:
T. Bickell , PBPP and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'NEILL v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2013cv05811
Petitioner:
FRANCIS O'NEILL
Respondent:
T. BICKELL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILDELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02455
Plaintiff:
Kevin Powell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, T. Bickell, James A. Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv06238
Petitioner:
KEVIN POWELL
Respondent:
T. BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
