Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv01254
Defendant:
C. Bell, L. C. Hence, J. Ceballos and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv00968
Defendant:
C. Bell, J. Ceballos, Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wilson v. California State Prison Corcor, et al
as 19-15237
Defendant / Appellee:
PATTEN, Supervising Correctional Cook I, D. OVERLEY, ADA Coordinator, R. TOLSON, Associate Warden Housing and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-15142
Defendant / Appellee:
OLIVEIRA, A. PACILLAS, Correctional Counselor, A. LACKOVIC, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Wilson v. California State Prison Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
California State Prison Corcoran, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Biter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Gipson et al
as 1:2016cv01525
Plaintiff:
Juan Matias Torres
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, L. Clausell, D. Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, R. S. LAMBERT, Chief Deputy Warden, J. MAHONEY, Psy. D and others
Bruce Phillippi, II v. Harlien, et al
as 14-16998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE PHILLIPPI, II, AKA Robert M. Ray
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLIEN, C/O, N. JACKSON, PACILLAS and others
Ray v. Harlien et al
as 1:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Ray
Defendant:
Harlien, N. Jackson, A. Pacillas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Mitchell v. D. Adams, et al
as 08-15580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. G. ADAMS, Warden, T. FELKER, Warden, M. MCDONALD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
