Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.87 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS et al
as 1:2008cv00378
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.87 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS, Estate of Rafaela G. Trevino, Minerva P. Dios Dado and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Memon v Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2008cv00961
Plaintiff:
Ghulam Memon
Defendant:
FBI, USCIS - Houston District Office, Sharon A Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Aktar v. Barrows et al
as 3:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Nadeem Aktar
Defendant:
Angela K Barrows, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Omoruyi v Chertoff et al
as 4:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Omoruyi and Linda Granderson Omoruyi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Sharon A. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
