Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stover v. Sniezek
as 5:2010cv01881
Petitioner:
James A. Stover
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zuluaga v. Sniezek et al
as 4:2009cv01326
Defendant:
T. R. Sniezek, Quinn, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Zuluaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuchs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2008cv01932
Plaintiff:
Howard Fuchs
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T. R. Sniezek, J.T. Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maclennan v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2007cv02133
Plaintiff:
Jason Maclennan
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, T. R. Sniezek, J.T. Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Whirlow v. Sniezek
as 4:2007cv01536
Petitioner:
Daniel Whirlow
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasquez-Estrada v. Sniezek
as 4:2007cv01310
Petitioner:
Jorge Vasquez-Estrada
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Sniezek
as 4:2007cv00932
Petitioner:
Morris J Perry, Sr.
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fernandez v. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Naturalizaion Services et al
as 4:2007cv00882
Petitioner:
Miguel Fernandez
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Naturalizaion Services and T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Halcrombe v. Sniezek et al
as 4:2007cv00779
Petitioner:
Laron Harvey Halcrombe
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Sniezek
as 4:2007cv00596
Petitioner:
T.J. Thompson
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
