Cases filed in Virginia
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff: Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant: City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Langhorne et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00702
Defendant: Kimberly Bowers, Virginia State Board of Elections, Charlie Judd and others
Plaintiff: Arelia S. Langhorne and Howard M. Butler
Petitioner: William J. Howell, Virginia House of Delegates, Kathy J. Byron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Kelly
as 1:2011cv00025
Plaintiff: Jamar T. Scott
Defendant: Loretta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Kelly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01127
Petitioner: Jamar T. Scott
Respondent: Loretta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2010cv00639
Petitioner: Warren T. Scott
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00032
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party: SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff: Patricia T. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff: Warren T. Scott
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00025
Plaintiff: Patricia T. Scott
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carter v. Gateway Bank and Trust Co.
as 3:2008cv00634
Plaintiff: T. Scott Carter
Defendant: Gateway Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?