Cases 61 - 70 of 10,368
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pool v. Garcia
as 7:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00968
Petitioner:
Ralph Ernest Alonso
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
William Hal McCarley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holbert, Sr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Holbert, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frosch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Kristopher Wilson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
