Cases 41 - 50 of 67
A.M. v. LAFAYETTE et al
as 2:2016cv04495
Plaintiff:
A.M. , ANA M. RAMOS and JOSE MERCADO
Defendant:
TEMPLE PHYSICIANS, INC. , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. and TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LASH v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY LASH
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT, INC. and TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MUKUNDAN v. EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2014cv05295
Plaintiff:
GEELHE MUKUNDAN
Defendant:
EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL and TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ABRAHAM v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv03645
Plaintiff:
ANNAMMA ABRAHAM
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wicks v. Macbenlee-Brown et al
as 3:2013cv02048
Petitioner:
David Bryant Wicks
Respondent:
Renita Camile Macbenlee-Brown, Colleran Firm & Associates, Vani Dadolu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
