Torts - Injury Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
United States, ex rel. Lovell & Mckusick, et al v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1245
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES, Ex. Rel Cheryl Lovell and William McKusick, CHERYL LOVELL, Relator and WILLIAM MCKUSICK, Relator
Defendant / Appellee: ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
United States, ex rel. Sanborn v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1246
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORDIE SANBORN and GEORDIE SANBORN, Relator
Defendant / Appellee: ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthes, Inc. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthesis, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Hamelin et al v. Kinder Morgan Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv30054
Defendant: Kinder Morgan Inc., Avangrid, Inc., Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., LLC and others
Plaintiff: Michael McCarron and Craig Hamelin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC
as 1:2018cv11931
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant: MALLINCKRODT PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC, QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Leysock v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY LEYSOCK, Ex Rel
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
McGuire v. Estate of Robert Cunningham, et al
as 17-1106
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK MCGUIRE
Plaintiff / Appellee: RYAN UEHLING, ex rel, JOHN DOE, ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: WENDY JOHNSON, ex rel, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant: HOWARD APPEL, JAMES SLATTERY, MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
Interested Party: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and LAWRENCE K. SPITZ, MD
Artis, et al v. N.E. Compounding Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 14-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party: PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant: HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Interested Party - Intervenor: OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
Bequette et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv12429
Plaintiff: Ann Bequette and Walter L. Bequette, Jr.
Defendant: Ameridose LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Intervenor: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?