Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McAhren et al v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jon McAhren, Josh Thompson and Kyle Garner
Defendant:
Local 816 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 429 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 760 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rattan v. Commissioner of Tennessee Board of Health
as 3:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
G. Rattan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Tennessee Board of Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Tate
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Robert E. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robison v. Tennessee Valley Authority Board of Directors et al
as 4:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kerry Robison
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority Board of Directors , Dennis Bottorff, Marilyn A. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wiles et al v. Ascom Transport System, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Norma Wiles, Thomas Wiles, Theresa Gibson and others
Defendant:
Ascom Transport System, Inc., Auto Alternative, Inc., Commonwealth Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2007cv00486
Plaintiff:
Fortune Williams
Defendant:
Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
